What is urban morphology supposed to be about? Specialization and the growth of a discipline K. Kropf and S. Malfroy

Most read articles by the same author(s)

• K. Kropf, Aspects of urban form , Urban Morphology: Vol. 13 No. 2 (2009): 2009 Volume 13.2
• K. Kropf, Ambiguity in the definition of built form , Urban Morphology: Vol. 18 No. 1 (2014): 2014 Volume 18.1
• K. Kropf , Plots, property and behaviour , Urban Morphology: Vol. 22 No. 1 (2018): 2018 Volume 22.1
• S. Malfroy , Urban morphology and project consulting: a Berlin experience , Urban Morphology: Vol. 5 No. 2 (2001): 2001 Volume 5.2
• Karl Kropf, Plots, formalism and the limits of the minimal , Urban Morphology: Vol. 23 No. 1 (2019): 2019 Volume 23.1
• K. Kropf , Review article: Evolution and urban form: staking out the ground for a more mature theory , Urban Morphology: Vol. 17 No. 2 (2013): 2013 Volume 17.2
• S. Malfroy, P. Steadman (2014) Building types and built forms , Urban Morphology: Vol. 20 No. 2 (2016): 2016 Volume 20.2
• K. Kropf, Consolidating urban morphology as a discipline K. Kropf , Urban Morphology: Vol. 18 No. 1 (2014): 2014 Volume 18.1
• K. Kropf, Italian urban morphology: the geographical perspective of Umberto Toschi E. Ravazzoli , Urban Morphology: Vol. 15 No. 2 (2011): 2011 Volume 15.2
• K. Kropf, The normative impulse K. Kropf , Urban Morphology: Vol. 20 No. 2 (2016): 2016 Volume 20.2